Does “XBOW AI Hacker” Deserve the Hype?

Utku Sen

Jun 25

2

1

Las week, I wrote an article about how AI hacker agents could reduce the need for human penetration testers.

Read →

1 Comment

michael

4hEdited

I'm also not 100% sure how to best read the Hacker1 leaderboard stats, but to me claiming the top spot with just 130/~1K resolved cases on bounty-less programs smells inconclusive at best

I.E. are they better at hacking the leaderboard than actual systems.

Expand full comment

Reply

Share

#nojs-banner { position: fixed; bottom: 0; left: 0; padding: 16px 16px 16px 32px; width: 100%; box-sizing: border-box; background: red; color: white; font-family: -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 13px; line-height: 13px; } #nojs-banner a { color: inherit; text-decoration: underline; } This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please turn on JavaScript or unblock scripts

Utku Sen’s Substack

Does “XBOW AI Hacker” Deserve the Hype?